NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA Quadro P600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1252 MHz
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 34.92 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 64% better floating-point performance: 1,117 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3327 vs 1651
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 435
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11181 vs 3053
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.134 vs 19.856
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 vs 84.489
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 vs 2709
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2875
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3328
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 vs 2709
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2875
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3328
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1252 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 vs 1651 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 vs 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 vs 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 vs 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 vs 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 vs 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3328 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1651 | 3327 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 | 542 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | 11181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | 35.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | 141.164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP107 | GP107 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 7 February 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | $178 |
Place in performance rating | 983 | 556 |
Price now | $119.99 | $169.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | 22.11 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | 1557 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 1329 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 1,117 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 34.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 4012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |