NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P500

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1124 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 68 Watt
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1577
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1577
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1671
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1671

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 January 2018 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed	1455 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 68 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 1671

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

2.1x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3567 vs 1633
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 547 vs 241
Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 6225
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 2622
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 2622

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 256
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3567 vs 1633
PassMark - G2D Mark	547 vs 241
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020 vs 6225
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921 vs 2622
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921 vs 2622

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1633

3567

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

241

547

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6225

12020

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2622

4921

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2622

4921

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

1577

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

1577

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

1671

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

1671

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P500	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
PassMark - G3D Mark	1633	3567
PassMark - G2D Mark	241	547
Geekbench - OpenCL	6225	12020
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2622	4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2622	4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685	1577
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685	1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	1671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	1671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		166.26
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1193

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P500	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP108	GM107
Launch date	5 January 2018	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	803	805
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$395.75
Price now		$343.99
Value for money (0-100)		13.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1455 MHz	1046 MHz
Floating-point performance	679.9 gflops	1,439 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	640
Texture fill rate	21.25 GTexel / s	44.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	68 Watt
Transistor count	1,800 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	3x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		202 mm
API support
DirectX	12_1	12.0 (11_0)
Vulkan
OpenGL		4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	32.1 GB / s	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
CUDA
Multi Monitor