NVIDIA Quadro P5000 versus NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P5000 and NVIDIA Tesla P40 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1303 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1531 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12585 versus 12190
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 versus 441
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 versus 9538
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 versus 9538
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1303 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1531 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12585 versus 12190 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 versus 441 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 versus 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 versus 9538 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Environ 32% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 367.4 GTexel / s versus 277.3 GTexel / s
- Environ 88% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2048
- Environ 33% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,758 gflops versus 8,873 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 24 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 10008 MHz versus 9016 MHz
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62453 versus 52705
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 versus 223.558
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 versus 2698.914
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.757 versus 14.206
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 versus 140.845
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1214.142 versus 927.006
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 3077
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 3077
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 367.4 GTexel / s versus 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,758 gflops versus 8,873 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 16 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10008 MHz versus 9016 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62453 versus 52705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 versus 223.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 versus 2698.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 versus 14.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 versus 140.845 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 versus 927.006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3077 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12585 | 12190 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52705 | 62453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 | 300.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 | 3559.383 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 | 19.757 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 | 204.32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 | 1214.142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 | 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3409 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 | 9538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3409 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP104 | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2016 | 13 September 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | $5,699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 244 | 246 |
| Prix maintenant | $1,699.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | 11,758 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 3840 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.3 GTexel / s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 11,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 480.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P5000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
