NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA Quadro P620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- 513.1x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 1 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 45x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 1800 million
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 237
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 2091
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 7960
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 vs 3527
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 vs 3527
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3566
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3566
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 2295
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 2295
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 1800 million |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 237 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 vs 2091 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 vs 7960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 vs 3527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 vs 3527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 2295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 2295 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 | 549 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2091 | 3670 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7960 | 12475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2295 | 6631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2295 | 6631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP108 | GP107 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 758 | 583 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Price now | $176.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 23.89 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.94 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 764.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.89 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s | 46.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 1800 million | 40 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor |