NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P520

NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
2.3x more core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 575 MHz
741.9x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
2x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 3245
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 3245

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527 vs 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527 vs 3245

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Around 17% higher pipelines: 448 vs 384
7.6x lower typical power consumption: 238 Watt vs 1800 million
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 240
Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3121 vs 2098
Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9716 vs 7880
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3566
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3566
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2295
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2295

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	448 vs 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	238 Watt vs 1800 million
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	462 vs 240
PassMark - G3D Mark	3121 vs 2098
Geekbench - OpenCL	9716 vs 7880
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

240

462

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2098

3121

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7880

9716

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

3245

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

3245

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

3710

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

3710

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3351

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA Tesla C2070
PassMark - G2D Mark	240	462
PassMark - G3D Mark	2098	3121
Geekbench - OpenCL	7880	9716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527	3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527	3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566	3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566	3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2295	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2295	3351
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		26.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		908.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.015
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		43.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		93.344

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi
Code name	GP108	GF100
Launch date	27 May 2019	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	761	758
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	448
Pixel fill rate	23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s	32.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	1800 million	238 Watt
Floating-point performance		1,030.4 gflops
Transistor count		3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Interface		PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		248 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.10 GB/s	144.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
Multi Monitor