NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 947 MHz
  • 1587.5x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 176.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
  • Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 8729
  • Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 8729
  • Around 58% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6252 vs 3952
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 February 2018 vs 24 October 2013
Boost clock speed 1569 MHz vs 947 MHz
Texture fill rate 279.4 GTexel/s vs 176.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15910 vs 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15910 vs 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6252 vs 3952

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X

  • Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
  • Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42508 vs 41715
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3719
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3719
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2816 vs 2560
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 42508 vs 41715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7055 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7055 vs 3719

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
41715
42508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15910
8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15910
8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
7055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
6252
3952
Name NVIDIA Quadro P5200 AMD Radeon R9 290X
Geekbench - OpenCL 41715 42508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15910 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15910 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6252 3952
PassMark - G3D Mark 8644
PassMark - G2D Mark 770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 114.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2460.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 628.757

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 AMD Radeon R9 290X

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 2.0
Code name GP104 Hawaii
Launch date 21 February 2018 24 October 2013
Place in performance rating 291 286
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $549

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1569 MHz 947 MHz
Core clock speed 1316 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 279.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 139.7 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.940 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 2816
Pixel fill rate 111.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 279.4 GTexel/s 176.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 7200 million 6,200 million
Floating-point performance 5,632 gflops
Stream Processors 2560

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size Large
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 275 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 230.4 GB/s 320 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) 1250 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)