NVIDIA Quadro P600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 533 versus 323
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3336
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 533 versus 323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 1329 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1557 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 34.92 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 1,117 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 4012 MHz
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 versus 3317
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20720 versus 11181
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 35.134
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 141.164
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 4662
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 4662
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 1329 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1557 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 1,117 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 4012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 versus 3317 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20720 versus 11181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 35.134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 141.164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 4662 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3317 | 5919 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 533 | 323 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 20720 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GP106B |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 1 February 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $178 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 563 | 564 |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1557 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1329 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,117 gflops | 2,488 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.92 GTexel / s | 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 112.1 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P600 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
ATIFireMV 2250
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
