NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7 GB/s
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 24.676
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3687
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3336
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3687
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1354 MHz
• Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• Around 43% better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 1,490 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 3670
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 549
• Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 12475
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 43.877
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 773.248
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 3.082
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 184.343
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 3575
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 650
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3336

Compare specifications (specs)