NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 21.766
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3691
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3340
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3691
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1354 MHz
• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
• 2.9x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 1,490 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 vs 3670
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 549
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 vs 12475
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 vs 43.877
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 vs 773.248
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 vs 3.082
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 vs 184.343
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 3575
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 10079
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 747
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 35369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 119.148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 1373.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 8.694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 21.766
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 454.799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3340

Compare specifications (specs)