NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 21.766
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 3691
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 3340
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 3691
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 3340
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 19 July 2016 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 21.766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1266 MHz
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1354 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 136.7 GTexel / s versus 46.56 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 512
- 2.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,375 gflops versus 1,490 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 versus 3670
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 versus 549
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 versus 12475
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 versus 43.877
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 versus 773.248
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 versus 3.082
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 versus 184.343
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 versus 3575
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 versus 3575
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1266 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1354 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s versus 46.56 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops versus 1,490 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 versus 3670 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 versus 549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 versus 12475 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 versus 43.877 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 versus 773.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 versus 3.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 versus 184.343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 versus 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 versus 3575 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 10079 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 747 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 35369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 119.148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 1373.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 8.694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 21.766 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 454.799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 12442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 12442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 907 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GP106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 19 July 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 356 |
| Prix maintenant | $176.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | 1709 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 250 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P620 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
