NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 180 Watt
• 501.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 10 GB/s
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 27.417
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3690
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3343
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3690
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)

• Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1354 MHz
• 6x more texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 512
• 6x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 1,490 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15578 vs 3670
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 vs 549
• 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 vs 12475
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 vs 43.877
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 vs 773.248
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 3.082
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 184.343
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11173 vs 3575
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11173 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 15578
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 887
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 55548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 150.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 2036.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 14.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 27.417
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 819.934
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 11173
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 11173
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3343

Compare specifications (specs)