NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 4.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 501.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 27.417
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 3690
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 3343
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 3690
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 3343
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 27 May 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 27.417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1266 MHz
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1354 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 277.3 GTexel / s versus 46.56 GTexel / s
- 5x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 512
- 6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 8,873 gflops versus 1,490 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 4.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15578 versus 3670
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 versus 549
- 4.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 versus 12475
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 versus 43.877
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 773.248
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 3.082
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 184.343
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11173 versus 3575
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11173 versus 3575
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1266 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1354 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.3 GTexel / s versus 46.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops versus 1,490 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15578 versus 3670 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 versus 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 versus 12475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 versus 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 184.343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 versus 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 versus 3575 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 15578 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 887 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 55548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1560 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP107 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 27 May 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 281 |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | $439.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | 43.72 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 2560 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 10 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |