NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 590
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 46689
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 vs 137.469
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 vs 12.352
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 15 November 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 vs 46689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 vs 137.469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 vs 12.352 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9464 vs 8366
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 343
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 vs 2046.214
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 vs 94.532
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 vs 645.647
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 vs 10140
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 vs 10140
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1469 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9464 vs 8366 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 vs 343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 vs 2046.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 vs 94.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 vs 645.647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 vs 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 vs 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 | 9464 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | 46689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | 137.469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | 2083.862 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | 12.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | 139.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | 762.142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 13383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 13383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4763 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | Polaris 30 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 15 November 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 325 | 260 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1469 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | 49.54 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s | 222.48 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 5,700 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
