NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- 1532.4x more texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8366 vs 6556
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 27104
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10140 vs 8931
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10140 vs 8931
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 1 February 2018 |
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 vs 6556 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 vs 27104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 vs 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 vs 8931 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 vs 343
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1063 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 vs 343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3706 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 | 6556 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 782 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | 27104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | Polaris 22 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 1 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 325 | 327 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1063 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 204.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
