NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1190 MHz
  • 1532.4x more texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8279 vs 6573
  • 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 27133
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10140 vs 8931
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10140 vs 8931
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 1 February 2018
Boost clock speed 1215 MHz vs 1190 MHz
Texture fill rate 175.0 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 1536
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8279 vs 6573
Geekbench - OpenCL 68305 vs 27133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10140 vs 8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10140 vs 8931

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

  • Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 340
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1063 MHz vs 600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 774 vs 340
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3706

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8279
6573
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
340
774
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
68305
27133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10140
8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3706
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10140
8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3706
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3351
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
PassMark - G3D Mark 8279 6573
PassMark - G2D Mark 340 774
Geekbench - OpenCL 68305 27133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 220.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 645.647
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10140 8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3706 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10140 8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3706 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2911

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 4.0
Code name TU106 Polaris 22
Launch date 27 May 2019 1 February 2018
Place in performance rating 337 334
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1215 MHz 1190 MHz
Core clock speed 600 MHz 1063 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.599 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 1536
Pixel fill rate 77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 175.0 GTexel/s 114.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million
Floating-point performance 3,656 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 IGP
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 204.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
Shared memory 0