NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q versus AMD Radeon RX 590
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 590 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 175 Watt
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 versus 46561
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 versus 137.469
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 versus 12.352
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 15 November 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 175 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 versus 46561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 versus 137.469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 versus 12.352 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1469 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 27% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 222.48 GTexel/s versus 175.0 GTexel/s
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9463 versus 8366
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 versus 343
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 versus 2046.214
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 versus 94.532
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 versus 645.647
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 versus 10140
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 versus 10140
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s versus 175.0 GTexel/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9463 versus 8366 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 versus 343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 versus 2046.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 versus 94.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 versus 645.647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 versus 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 versus 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 | 9463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | 46561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | 137.469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | 2083.862 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | 12.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | 139.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | 762.142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 13383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 13383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4760 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | TU106 | Polaris 30 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 15 November 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 325 | 259 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1215 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 1469 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | 49.54 GP/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s | 222.48 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10800 million | 5,700 million |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970 X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
