NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 1273.7x more texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 34875
  • 32.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 103
  • 32.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 103
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 21 February 2018
Texture fill rate 175.0 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 1792
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 68305 vs 34875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 103

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

  • 2x more core clock speed: 1227 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1647 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10568 vs 8366
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 343
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 10140
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 10140
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1227 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1647 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 10568 vs 8366
PassMark - G2D Mark 518 vs 343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16345 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16345 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3706

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8366
10568
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
343
518
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
68305
34875
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10140
16345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3706
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
103
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10140
16345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3706
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
103
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark 8366 10568
PassMark - G2D Mark 343 518
Geekbench - OpenCL 68305 34875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 220.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 645.647
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10140 16345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3706 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 103
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10140 16345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3706 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 103
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU106 GP104
Launch date 27 May 2019 21 February 2018
Place in performance rating 325 285
Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1215 MHz 1647 MHz
Core clock speed 600 MHz 1227 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.599 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 1792
Pixel fill rate 77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 175.0 GTexel/s 137.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million 7,200 million
Floating-point performance 4,398 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 192.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz