NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
1273.7x more texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 39050
32.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 103
32.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 103

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 21 February 2018
Texture fill rate	175.0 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 1792
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	68305 vs 39050
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351 vs 103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351 vs 103

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

2x more core clock speed: 1227 MHz vs 600 MHz
Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1647 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10687 vs 8202
Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 481 vs 332
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 10140
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 10140

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1227 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1647 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	10687 vs 8202
PassMark - G2D Mark	481 vs 332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16345 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16345 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714 vs 3706

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8202

10687

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

332

481

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

68305

39050

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10140

16345

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3706

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3351

103

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10140

16345

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3706

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3351

103

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark	8202	10687
PassMark - G2D Mark	332	481
Geekbench - OpenCL	68305	39050
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	220.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	645.647
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10140	16345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3706	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351	103
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10140	16345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3706	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351	103
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU106	GP104
Launch date	27 May 2019	21 February 2018
Place in performance rating	329	296
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	1647 MHz
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1227 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.599 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	1792
Pixel fill rate	77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	175.0 GTexel/s	137.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	7,200 million
Floating-point performance		4,398 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	192.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 Bit
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		6008 MHz