NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 110 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 8202
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 332
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 10140
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 10140
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 8202 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3706 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8202 | 14832 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 332 | 705 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 19565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 19565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU106 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 329 | 188 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | 296.6 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | 18.98 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | 9.492 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s | 296.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V7600
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDFireStream 9250
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970 X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X
