NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 110 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 110 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3346 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Environ 73% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1035 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 69% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 296.6 GTexel/s versus 175.0 GTexel/s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 3072 versus 2304
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 versus 8366
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 versus 343
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 versus 10140
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 versus 10140
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1035 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s versus 175.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 versus 2304 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 versus 8366 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 versus 343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 versus 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 versus 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3706 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 | 14832 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU106 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 325 | 176 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1215 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | 296.6 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | 18.98 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | 9.492 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s | 296.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 110 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10800 million | 13600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Largeur | IGP | IGP |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |