NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1475 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 17.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 13123
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 13123
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 23 June 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1475 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 13123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 13123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 839 vs 529
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13369 vs 12513
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78565 vs 70509
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 839 vs 529 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13369 vs 12513 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78565 vs 70509 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | 839 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12513 | 13369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 13123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 13123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70509 | 78565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 23 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 199 | 202 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1475 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 4096 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12500 million |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 755.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.17 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.08 TFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 94.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID M6-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
