NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Around 95% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 215 Watt
- 1062.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 215 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 551
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 vs 12627
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 19529
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 19529
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 vs 551 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 vs 12627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 7 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | 885 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 | 18252 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 25232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 25232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 2 July 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 171 | 133 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 13.6 B |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Width | IGP | 2-Slot |
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
