NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 15% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2560
- 6.9x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 36% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10104 vs 7438
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 551
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15107 vs 12627
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 vs 19529
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 vs 19529
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6319 vs 3715
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6319 vs 3715
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5714 vs 3356
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5714 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2944 vs 2560 |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10104 vs 7438 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 vs 551 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 vs 12627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 vs 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 vs 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 10104 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | 812 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 | 15107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 22622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 22622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 6319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 6319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 5714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 5714 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 171 | 106 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Price now | $699.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2944 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
