NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1110 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 November 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7856 vs 7438
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 19529
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 19529
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 vs 7438 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 7856 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85570 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 171 | 195 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
