NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1110 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 12% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 222.5 GTexel/s
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2304
- Environ 45% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 160 Watt
- Environ 8% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 13 November 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 222.5 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3714 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7856 versus 7438
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 19529
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 19529
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 versus 7438 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 7856 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 171 | 195 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | 222.5 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 13600 million |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | IGP | |
Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |