NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 1665.4x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 12021
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 12021
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 15 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 12021 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 4.9x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5569 vs 3714
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5034 vs 3359
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5569 vs 3714
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5034 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 5034 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 5034 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP106 |
GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 15 August 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Place in performance rating | 195 | 276 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |