NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- 671.2x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1430 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 78188
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 13720
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 13720
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 20 June 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1430 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 vs 78188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 13720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 13720 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6381 vs 3714
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8915 vs 3359
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6381 vs 3714
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8915 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6381 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8915 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6381 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8915 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 78188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 13720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 6381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 8915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 13720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 6381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 8915 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 611 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11814 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP100 |
GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 20 June 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $5,699 |
Place in performance rating | 211 | 176 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1329 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 331.5 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 720.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |