NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 345 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 7 August 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 345 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 19324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 19324 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 429.30 GTexel/s vs 259.2 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 429.30 GTexel/s vs 259.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 19324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 19324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3362 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 August 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 169 | 208 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1677 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1406 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | 840 GFLOPs |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | 26.7 TFLOPs |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | 13.4 TFLOPs |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 107.30 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 429.30 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 345 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 13.7 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 282 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 1000 Watt | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
