NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1215 MHz
• Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1379 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16063 vs 9878
• Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 vs 436
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 37928
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 vs 214.123
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 2293.496
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 vs 12.704
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1106.12 vs 692.9
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 14915
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 14915
• 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 4887

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 200 Watt
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.717 vs 118.544
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3719
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3358
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3719
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16063 9878
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	749 436
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	105171 37928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	226.447 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4161.764 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.476 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.544 139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1106.12 692.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 8048
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	10685 4887

Compare specifications (specs)