NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 19081
- 60x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 62
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 57
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 19081
- 60x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 62
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 57
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 27 March 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 19081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 19081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131696 vs 105171
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 vs 105171 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 131696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 19081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 19081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 57 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU104 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
| Place in performance rating | 138 | 264 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | |
| Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIARTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
