NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1098 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8878 vs 4920
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8878 vs 4920
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 vs 336
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6738 vs 3446
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33747 vs 8148
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 3 December 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1098 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 vs 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 vs 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 vs 336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6738 vs 3446 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33747 vs 8148 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | 336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6738 | 3446 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33747 | 8148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Code name | N19P-Q1 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 3 December 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 375 | 700 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1098 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla K80
