NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD FirePro S7000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD FirePro S7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 950 MHz
• 918.9x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 76 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6601 vs 4524
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 52.282

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7000

• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 421

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6601 4524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	421 705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.83 52.282

Compare specifications (specs)