NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1029 MHz
Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1098 MHz
1590.2x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 3446
Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 404 vs 336
4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 8148
Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 47.281
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 4920
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 4920

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 3 December 2015
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 1029 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz vs 1098 MHz
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 55 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6494 vs 3446
PassMark - G2D Mark	404 vs 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981 vs 8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	87.83 vs 47.281
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009 vs 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009 vs 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6494

3446

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

404

336

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

32981

8148

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

87.83

47.281

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9009

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3355

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	6494	3446
PassMark - G2D Mark	404	336
Geekbench - OpenCL	32981	8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	87.83	47.281
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9009	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9009	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		172.896

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T1000	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Code name	TU117	GM107
Launch date	27 May 2019	3 December 2015
Place in performance rating	400	700
Type	Mobile Workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1098 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	640
Pixel fill rate	46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	69.84 GTexel/s	43.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,405 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus