NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10967 vs 6494
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 404
- Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 32981
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 9009
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 9009
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10967 vs 6494 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 vs 404 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63532 vs 32981 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 | 10967 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 498 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 63532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | N19E-Q1 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 400 | 249 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | 198.7 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | 12.72 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | 6.359 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | 88.32 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 198.7 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 10800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | Large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M365X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M
