NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3698
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3698
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7235 vs 6494
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 404
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 32981
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 9009
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 9009
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7235 vs 6494 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 404 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 32981 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 vs 9009 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 | 7235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 38863 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 400 | 362 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | 114.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | 7.311 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M365X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M
