NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs AMD FirePro S9050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• 904.8x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 12.5x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7858 vs 4901
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 466 vs 369
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 68.324
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1463.376
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 6.491
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 91.133
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 344.551
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 7062
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 7062

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 855 MHz
• Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
• 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
• 4.4x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 2476
• 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 2238
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 2476
• 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7858 4901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	466 369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 68.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 1463.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 6.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 91.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 344.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 13032
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 13032

Compare specifications (specs)