NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 855 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 902 MHz
• 421.2x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 12.5x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39085 vs 24016
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 67.178
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1816.61
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 7.435
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 88.889
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 355.166

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

• 2.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1024
• 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
• 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8068 vs 7852
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 466
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 9851
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2238
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 9851
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7852 8068
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	466 539
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39085 24016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 355.166
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3356

Compare specifications (specs)