NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39487 vs 39168
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 135.146
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1315.075
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 8.799
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 93.209
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 570.245

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 855 MHz
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1425 MHz
• 6.4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7871 vs 7790
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 571 vs 469
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 9851
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2238
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 9851
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7790 7871
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	469 571
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39487 39168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 135.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 1315.075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 8.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 93.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 570.245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3358

Compare specifications (specs)