NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA RTX A5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• 12.8x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 230 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000

• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1170 MHz vs 855 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1425 MHz
• 4.8x more texture fill rate: 433.9 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
• 8x more pipelines: 8192 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22553 vs 7788
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1032 vs 483
• 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154729 vs 40286
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 157.821
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 1934.012
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 10.833
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 vs 136.552
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 684.333
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 9851
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2238
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 9851
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7788 22553
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	483 1032
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	40286 154729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 581.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 6836.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 54.372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 191.518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 2038.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 22508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 22508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3355

Compare specifications (specs)