NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA RTX A5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA RTX A5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 12.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 230 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1170 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1425 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 433.9 GTexel/s versus 91.20 GTexel/s
- 8x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22553 versus 7788
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1032 versus 483
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 154729 versus 40286
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 versus 157.821
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 versus 1934.012
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 versus 10.833
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 versus 136.552
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 versus 684.333
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 versus 9851
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 2238
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 versus 9851
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1425 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s versus 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 8192 versus 1024 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22553 versus 7788 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 versus 483 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154729 versus 40286 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 versus 157.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 versus 1934.012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 versus 10.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 versus 136.552 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 versus 684.333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | 22553 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 1032 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | 154729 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 581.432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 6836.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 54.372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 191.518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 2038.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 22508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 22508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3355 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GA102 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 350 | 69 |
| Genre | Laptop | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 1170 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 8192 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 162.7 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 433.9 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
