NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- 671.6x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 154.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3703 vs 2443
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3703 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1674
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1674
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41094 vs 33819
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 4 August 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 926 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 154.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 vs 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 vs 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1674 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41094 vs 33819 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 7682
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 7682
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 423
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7995 vs 6886
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
| Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 7682 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 vs 423 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7995 vs 6886 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1674 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41094 | 33819 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 725 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6886 | 7995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3675 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Ellesmere |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 4 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 389 | 386 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Price now | $109.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1206 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 154.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,700 million |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 6600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M XT
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 380
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
