NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 280X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 79% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1000 MHz
892.2x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7248 vs 6152
Around 41% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 2351

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 8 October 2013
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7248 vs 6152
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319 vs 2351

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X

2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 441
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 9313
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 9313

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2048 vs 1024
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	675 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9603 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3700 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9603 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3700 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7248

6152

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

441

675

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

9603

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

9603

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3357

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3319

2351

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark	7248	6152
PassMark - G2D Mark	441	675
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319	2351
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		89.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1434.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		87.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		493.57

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 280X
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	TU117	Tahiti
Launch date	27 May 2019	8 October 2013
Place in performance rating	381	383
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$299
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2048
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	128.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	4,313 million
Floating-point performance		4,096 gflops
Stream Processors		2048
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		275 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	288 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)