NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1506 MHz
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1709 MHz
  • 835.4x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
  • Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 35365
  • 3.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 907
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 19 July 2016
Core clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1506 MHz
Boost clock speed 1785 MHz vs 1709 MHz
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 vs 35365
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3319 vs 907

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10086 vs 7222
  • Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 vs 437
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 9313
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 9313
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1280 vs 1024
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 10086 vs 7222
PassMark - G2D Mark 749 vs 437
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12442 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12442 vs 9313

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7222
10086
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
437
749
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38863
35365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3319
907
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark 7222 10086
PassMark - G2D Mark 437 749
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 35365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3319 907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 119.148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1373.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.766
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 454.799

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU117 GP106
Launch date 27 May 2019 19 July 2016
Place in performance rating 364 359
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $299

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1785 MHz 1709 MHz
Core clock speed 1575 MHz 1506 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 1280
Pixel fill rate 57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s 136.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 120 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 4,400 million
Floating-point performance 4,375 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 250 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 192.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 8008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5