NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1168 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1284 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 34584
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 9258
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 9258
- 3.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 849
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 15 October 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1168 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1284 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 34584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 vs 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 vs 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 vs 849 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7663 vs 7222
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 667 vs 437
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7663 vs 7222 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 vs 437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3698 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7222 | 7663 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 | 667 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 34584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 849 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 15 October 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 364 | 365 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1284 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1168 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
ATIFireGL V8600
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 480
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
IntelArc A570M
