NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA RTX A4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 140 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
| Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 vs 12 Apr 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 4608
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121357 vs 96207
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1007 vs 562
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19457 vs 15916
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 4608 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121357 vs 96207 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1007 vs 562 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19457 vs 15916 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 96207 | 121357 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 | 1007 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15916 | 19457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10991 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD106 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 | 12 Apr 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 100 | 103 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 4608 | 6144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Transistor count | 22900 million | 17400 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Single-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
