NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation and AMD Radeon RX 6600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 2491 MHz
- 8.6x more pipelines: 15360 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 24158 vs 15146
- Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 132358 vs 72643
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 2491 MHz |
| Pipelines | 15360 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 24158 vs 15146 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 132358 vs 72643 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1626 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 232.1x more texture fill rate: 279.0 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 132 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 759
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1626 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 279.0 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 759 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6600
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 759 | 875 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 24158 | 15146 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 132358 | 72643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 260.061 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.228 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8083 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD102 | Navi 23 XL |
| Place in performance rating | 42 | 40 |
| Launch date | 13 Oct 2021 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 2491 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1626 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 15360 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 440.9 GPixel/s | 159.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 1,202 GTexel/s | 279.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 132 Watt |
| Transistor count | 76300 million | 11060 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 558.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.928 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 190 mm (7.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX A4500
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900M
