NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- 2.6x more pipelines: 15360 vs 5888
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 24115 vs 22362
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Pipelines | 15360 vs 5888 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24115 vs 22362 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 264.1x more texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 748
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123160 vs 119937
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 vs 748 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123160 vs 119937 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 | 996 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24115 | 22362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 119937 | 123160 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13676 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD102 | GA104 |
Place in performance rating | 48 | 46 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 15360 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 440.9 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 1,202 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 76300 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |