NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 902 MHz
- 576.4x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
- Around 16% higher pipelines: 3328 vs 2880
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 551
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13585 vs 8096
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 73337 vs 24013
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 vs 23 July 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3328 vs 2880 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 551 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 vs 8096 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 vs 24013 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 562 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 551 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 | 8096 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 | 24013 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.178 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.435 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.889 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 355.166 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
Code name | GA106 | GK110B |
Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $5,265 |
Place in performance rating | 128 | 364 |
Price now | $833.98 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 902 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3328 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 7,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,196 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Width | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |