NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1098 MHz
2841.5x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
5.2x more pipelines: 3328 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 336
3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13585 vs 3446
9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 73337 vs 8148

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Aug 2021 vs 3 December 2015
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 1098 MHz
Texture fill rate	124.8 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3328 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	971 vs 336
PassMark - G3D Mark	13585 vs 3446
Geekbench - OpenCL	73337 vs 8148

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 70 Watt
3.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)

Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 562 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 70 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

971

336

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13585

3446

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

73337

8148

Name	NVIDIA RTX A2000	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G2D Mark	971	336
PassMark - G3D Mark	13585	3446
Geekbench - OpenCL	73337	8148
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		172.896
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3355

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA RTX A2000	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell
Code name	GA106	GM107
Launch date	10 Aug 2021	3 December 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$449
Place in performance rating	128	700
Type		Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1098 MHz
Core clock speed	562 MHz	1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3328	640
Pixel fill rate	57.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	124.8 GTexel/s	43.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	70 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	13250 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,405 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	167 mm (6.6 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU)	250 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	69 mm (2.7 inches)
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.2	12
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.6	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	288 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus