NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 3328 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 892
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13585 vs 9372
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 73337 vs 32343
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 vs 10 June 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3328 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 892 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 vs 9372 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 vs 32343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 1345
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 vs 1345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 892 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 | 9372 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 | 32343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1345 | 3404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA106 | GP106 |
Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 | 10 June 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Place in performance rating | 128 | 307 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 119.4 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | 59.72 GFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 3.822 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3328 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | 59.72 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 4400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | 201 mm (7.9") |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 200.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 160 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |