NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 752.7x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- Around 86% higher pipelines: 3328 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 795
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13585 vs 11545
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 73337 vs 42289
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1345 vs 1115
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3328 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 795 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 vs 11545 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 vs 42289 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1345 vs 1115 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 5.1x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
| Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 795 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 | 11545 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 | 42289 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1345 | 1115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 | 6 February 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $815 |
| Place in performance rating | 128 | 287 |
| Price now | $799.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1202 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3328 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | 241 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7604 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
