NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 199.7 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 526 vs 498
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12647 vs 10967
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20429 vs 14496
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20429 vs 14496
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78981 vs 63532
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1080 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 526 vs 498 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12647 vs 10967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 vs 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 vs 14496 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78981 vs 63532 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 526 | 498 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12647 | 10967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 | 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 | 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78981 | 63532 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | N19E-Q1 |
| Place in performance rating | 174 | 249 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1080 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.7 GFLOPS (1:64) | 198.7 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.72 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS | 6.359 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 88.32 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 198.7 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 10800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | Large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
